Despite Misleading Headlines, Missouri v Biden is Not Over!
Let's take a look at the SCOTUS decision.
On Wednesday, June 26th, the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Murthy v Missouri, not Missouri v Biden. Murthy is the government’s appeal of the preliminary injunction, issued originally by the Chief United States District Judge for the Western District of Louisiana, Judge Terry Doughty, last July 4th. Ruling 6-3 in the government’s favor, Justice Amy Coney Barrett delivered an extremely disappointing opinion for the majority.
It was not the SCOTUS decision we were hoping for, but thankfully the Justices made no ruling on the merits, instead making their decision based on standing. Hence, Missouri v Biden moves forward without the benefit of the injunction, which would have prevented any further government censorship of speech on social media while the case proceeds. Because so many headlines and personal commentaries misinterpreted the decision as a dismissal of the entire case, Health Freedom Louisiana Co-Director Jill Hines, a plaintiff in the case, wants to ensure that factual information is presented to the health freedom community in Louisiana.
Click on the image below for the press release from the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), Jill’s outstanding legal representation in Missouri v Biden.
Jill’s attorneys at NCLA, Jenin Younes and John Vecchione, always have remarkable commentary on the case - if you are not yet following them on X, do so now. Below are just a couple of snippets from yesterday.
For a comprehensive analysis of Missouri v Biden, including the SCOTUS opinion, we always recommend the meticulous Tracy Beanz. Jill had the pleasure of meeting Tracy when the plea for the preliminary injunction was heard before Judge Doughty in Monroe in May 2023. She has been writing about the case from the outset and quickly became a favorite source for a rigorous review of each significant court filing over the last few years. Tracy’s dissection of the SCOTUS opinion is, once again, stellar. Click on the image below to read the entire thread.
We cannot emphasize enough the necessity of reading Tracy’s entire thread. This is an appalling and erroneous decision from SCOTUS and she details why.
Other commentaries worth your time on the SCOTUS decision are from Brownstone Institute and Jeff Childers of Coffee and Covid.
Of note, the plaintiffs in Missouri v Biden have requested Judge Doughty issue a subpoena to Anthony Fauci, Google, and others for the deleted emails discussed by Fauci’s assistant, Dr. David Morens, during a congressional oversight hearing last month. Again, Tracy Beanz offers a complete review of that motion, just click on the image below.
One last encouraging comment from Justice Alito. . .
If you have time, read the entire dissent. Don’t let the naysayers and the ignorant lead you astray.
This is not over!
Thank you for helping us fill our tanks during the session!! Our advocacy is only possible with your help! THANK YOU!!
If you find value in our work, please consider donating to us to help fund our efforts. We are 100% volunteers and do not get paid, but we give our time to research, inform, and empower others because we know it’s critical to maintaining our liberties. Parents must know their rights so they can protect their freedom.
For media inquiries, please email info@healthfreedomla.org
Don’t leave your family and friends without the information needed to fight for their health freedom! Click the button below and share Braving Freedom! 🇺🇸